Federalist 62 Considered

madisonFOUNDERS CORNER, MAJOR WORKS

Federalist 62. Madison reminds us that the election of U.S. Senators by their respective state legislatures secured state rights or authority. In your opinion, how might a return to this vital constitutional principle become a key element in empowering a push back against federal intrusion into powers our heaven inspired Constitution clearly retained as jurisdictionally belonging to state & local governments, to families & individuals, to private businesses, churches, & charities?


Self Educated Man and Founders Corner Library are projects of Steve Farrell and The Moral Liberal. Copyright © 2014 Steve Farrell and The Moral Liberal.


The Holy Cause of Liberty

patrick henry 3LIBERTY LETTERS, PATRICK HENRY, 1775

In 1970, as a seventh-grade student, I remember the thrilling inspiration I felt as I studied the lives and words of the founding fathers. There was Sam Adams and the Boston Tea Party, Thomas Jefferson and the Declaration of Independence, John Adams and the Fair Trial, George Washington and Valley Forge, Paul Revere and his famous Midnight Ride, and most distinct in my memory, Patrick Henry’s immortal oration “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!”

At that impressionable age, I perceived little difference between Henry’s message and spirit than what I had felt when I heard the great stories of the Bible. The founders seemed to me, as prophets, dedicated to the “holy cause of liberty.” Heaven-sent men, called to inspire a generation to strip themselves of the sin of fear and allay themselves — even unto death — to duty, honor, and country. Freedom was, to them, a “celestial article,” which “Heaven” had “highly rated.”

Continue reading

John Adams on ‘An Accomplished Judge’

John Adams2Liberty Letters, John Adams, 1756

One of the most diabolical features of our present dumbed-down, secularized, and thoroughly corrupted educational system in the United States is its systematic stripping out of the moral and religious roots of the very Founders of the system of government we live under – and this our public schools do even as they claim to be preparing our sons and daughters to be responsible citizens.

Yet religion and morality were openly discussed, and deep-seated in the hearts of these great men.

So it was with 21 year old John Adams’, as he reflected, nearly daily, on his feelings while attending Harvard College (where he received both his Bachelors and Masters of Arts degrees).

Continue reading

WHO should pay taxes? WHY? HOW?

Patrick Lee as Thomas JeffersonThe remaining revenue on the consumption of foreign articles, is paid cheerfully by those who can afford to add foreign luxuries to domestic comforts, being collected on our seaboards and frontiers only, and incorporated with the transactions of our mercantile citizens, it may be the pleasure and pride of an American to ask, what farmer, what mechanic, what laborer, ever sees a tax-gatherer of the United States? These contributions enable us to support the current expenses of the government…
2nd Inaugural Address, March 4, 1805

Patrick Lee’s Explanation
Self-limiting leaders restrict taxation to those who can afford it.
The previous post detailed Jefferson’s efforts to reduce the size of government and the taxes necessary to support it. Those were internal taxes, ones imposed on everyday people and things.  Those everyday people could now delight in asking, “what farmer, what mechanic, what laborer, ever sees a tax-gatherer of the United States?”

Continue reading

Bastiat – God, ‘The Law’ & The Rights of Man

Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850)

Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850)

by Steve Farrell

Sometimes secularism sounds legitimate.

One of the more thoughtful arguments used by proponents of a secular state, or of a state that mandates the removal of all religious and moral speech and symbols from public life, is Frenchmen Frederic Bastiat’s 1840 classic treatise, “The Law.”

Periodically, letters come to this writer encouraging him to read “The Law” so that his “eyes may be opened … for certainly religion and morality have no place in American law,” they claim, “and Bastiat explains why.”

The scolders are right; Bastiat’s “The Law” is a must read. But the scolders are wrong; Bastiat did not oust religion and morality from public life; he simply defended their proper use and denounced their misuse.

Continue reading